You are viewing [info]thefirstalicat's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

FantAsia 5: Phasma Ex Machina (USA, 2010)

  • Jul. 16th, 2010 at 8:35 PM
CuriousityArty
In Phasma Ex Machina, Cody (played by Sasha Andreev) is devastated by the sudden deaths of his parents; even though he's just barely an adult, he has sole custody of younger brother James (Max Hauser), whom he is unintentionally neglecting because of the force of his grief. A year and more later, he has become obsessed with creating a machine that will "bring them back," using electromagnetic fields and negative ions to create something of a bridge between one world and the next. After all, just because people have "passed over" into death doesn't mean the realm they go to is immune from the laws of physics, right? Cody is able to buy arcane electronic equipment, creating his own Vandergraaf Generator and using solar adapters made and sold by Tom (Matthew Feeney), an older man just coming to terms with the death of his wife six years ago and just starting to form a relationship with a new woman. But Cody is on to something, and Tom's not as much over his grief as he thinks he is. Add to that the fact that nobody can control who might "come back," and, well, anything might happen....

This is a first film by writer/director Matt Osterman, who hosted this World Premiere (presumably outside of his immediate family circle and a few critics here and there), and I've got to say, it's perfect. In every way, this is a perfect film - the writing, the direction, the framing of the story, the cinematography, the acting, everything. The only actor I'd heard of in this is Laurie King (who plays a middle-aged neighbour of the boys, in a small but key role), but every one of these actors is spot on. Completely naturalistic in behaviour and authentic in dialogue - you really believe these are real, ordinary people doing things that real, ordinary people do, or would like to do. I was especially impressed with Sasha Andreev, who looks a bit like a cross between Freddy Rodriguez and Casey Affleck, and whose acting is as good as the latter's without the annoying adenoidal voice. Even the ending of the film is perfect, in that not everything comes out alright, but that's okay because that is the way life really is.

Really. This film should be getting a decent release in the US - it helps a lot that it's American-made and in English, perhaps our only FantAsia film without subtitles; I've read rumours that major studios are already lining up for a Hollywood remake, but you know they'll fuck that up. So do what you can to encourage a release, please; it's very much worth it! Go to http://www.phasmamovie.com/ - the official website - and check out the trailer for yourself.

This is quite possibly the best film I've seen all year - not best FantAsia film, but film, period. A gazillion stars!

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 17th, 2010 04:04 pm (UTC)
Agree to disagree
Having seen the film at FantAsia as well, I have to say I'm not sure what you watched, but it clearly was not the same film I did. The acting was wooden, and over the top. Sasha Andreev was by far the best thing about this film, but even his performance was a bit soapy at times. The look of the film only gave the impression that the DP clearly had little to no knowledge of how a camera actually works, and what are good angles vs amateur ones. That combined with the flat look of the color grading just made the film very much seem like a first attempt. Far from a success. The opening credits were far superior to the rest of the film, which at first gave me hope, only to drastically let me down moments later. The story is not bad, if you remove some of the absolutely horrid dialog that clogs it up. The sound is the real only saving grace for the film, as it sounded pretty good, which quite obviously helped the overall quality of the film, but still couldn't save it.

I'm sorry but, as you're picture implies, you must be a plant.
[info]thefirstalicat wrote:
Jul. 17th, 2010 06:25 pm (UTC)
Re: Agree to disagree
You're certainly welcome to disagree, though leaving comments anonymously is rude. You're not welcome to insult me by calling me a "plant," however. That is beyond rude and not to be tolerated.
[info]piratesorka wrote:
Jul. 17th, 2010 09:47 pm (UTC)
Re: Agree to disagree
Very rude indeed.
[info]piratesorka wrote:
Jul. 17th, 2010 09:46 pm (UTC)
A gazillion stars? Wow, even I'm impressed by that alone!
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

CuriousityArty
[info]thefirstalicat
thefirstalicat

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com